Category: Q. Cicero's Commentariolum


Permalink 01:42:43 pm, by Chris Jones Email , 407 words, 5686 views   English (US)
Categories: Q. Cicero's Commentariolum

Commentariolum pt. 4

Let’s take a final look at Quintus’ Commentariolum Petitionis for this election cycle. While the usual “the more things change…” review of election tactics old & new has (spero) been interesting, I don’t want to be accused of promoting too much cynicism in our political process.



Permalink 04:52:59 pm, by Chris Jones Email , 390 words, 2394 views   English (US)
Categories: Q. Cicero's Commentariolum

Commentariolum pt. 3

Nobody, it seems, likes the attack ads that have become so commonplace in modern election campaigns. But there’s a simple reason why such advertising exists: It works, a fact even the Romans knew 2000 years ago.



Permalink 11:22:53 am, by Chris Jones Email , 194 words, 5417 views   English (US)
Categories: Q. Cicero's Commentariolum

Commentariolum pt. 2

In elections both ancient and modern, campaign promises are commmonplace and Quintus reminds his brother of the reason they are so effective:



Permalink 09:55:45 am, by Chris Jones Email , 289 words, 4475 views   English (US)
Categories: News, Q. Cicero's Commentariolum

Commentariolum pt. I

Thus begins a series of excepts from Q. Cicero’s Commentariolum Petitionis as a reflection on current US electoral events.



Permalink 04:52:57 pm, by Chris Jones Email , 202 words, 2156 views   English (US)
Categories: Q. Cicero's Commentariolum

Q. Cicero's Commentariolum Petitionis

I mentioned Quintus Cicero’s Commentariolum Petitionis in a post earlier this month. With the US election approaching, I thought I’d post a few choice paragraphs over the days leading up to November 4th. First though, a little background.

The Commentariolum Petitionis was ostensibly written by Quintus Cicero as a letter/pamphlet to advise his brother’s successful run for the consulship in 64 BCE. I say “ostensibly” because there are reasons to doubt the full authorship. Some of the passages are echoed in other speeches of Cicero; either Cicero plagiarized his brother or the orator is the actual author of at least some passages in the Commentariolum. Also the pamphlet seems to over-emphasize the danger of Catiline as an election opponent (Catiline ended up losing badly). Assuming the pamphlet was written after the Catilinarian conspiracy would explain this, as memories of the personal threat to Cicero might make Catiline loom larger in the author’s mind. But regardless of who wrote it, most scholars agree the pamphlet comes from the 1st century BCE and accurately reflects the political climate of its time.

Look for a few choice excerpts in the coming days. I’ll also add a blog category to help with filtering on this topic.

Qui sciet quae quoque sint modo dicenda, nisi tamen in procinctu paratamque ad omnis casus habuerit eloquentiam, velut clausis thesauris incubabit.

January 2018
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 17

powered by b2evolution free blog software